“Motivating Factor” Standard Replaces “Contributory Factor”

Employment Law Practice Group

By Employment Law Practice Group

Over the past decade, Missouri has been viewed as a plaintiff-friendly state in workplace discrimination lawsuits. Effective August 28, 2017, Senate Bill 43 was signed into law by Missouri Governor Eric Greitens, which amends the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). The law changes the applicable standard for liability of an employer and more closely aligns Missouri law with federal policies and law. The standard for liability has moved from proof that the discriminatory conduct was a “contributing factor” to “the motivating factor.”

Under the more strict “motivating factor” standard, a plaintiff must prove, not only that the accused employer was unlawfully biased against the plaintiff’s protected classification, but also that this bias had a “determinative influence” on the employer’s decision to terminate the plaintiff. (Missouri Revised Statutes 213.010(19) 2017). The MHRA specifies that only employers are considered entities, not individuals, subject to liability for proven discrimination.

Also important, the MHRA changes language of the Act and now requires that a complaint must be formally filed by the victim within 180 days of any alleged discriminatory offense. Previously, in Missouri, a victim could file a complaint of discrimination within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory conduct.

Changes were also made to provide a more specific guideline for awarding punitive damages, such that now the maximum penalty possible depends upon the total number of employees of the employer, with the penalties ranging from $50,000 to $500,000.

Finally, the law created the Whistle-Blower Protection Act, which prohibits termination of whistle-blowers for their actions in whistle blowing.

As of the effective date of this law, the general assembly expressly abrogated the cases of Daugherty v. City of Maryland Heights, 231 S.W.3d 814 (Mo. 2007) and its progeny as they relate to the contributing factor standard and abandonment of the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). Mo. Ann. Stat. § 213.101 (2017).

Comments are closed.

Skip to content