Missouri’s Paid Sick Leave Law: Quickly Approaching Deadline on April 15, 2025

Katherine M. Flett

By Katherine M. Flett



In November 2024, Missouri voters approved Proposition A, which provided increases to Missouri’s minimum wage and requires most private employers (even most small businesses!) to provide paid sick leave to employees (with very limited exceptions such as employees of businesses whose annual gross volume sales is less than $500,000, casual babysitters, and golf caddies), beginning on May 1, 2025. The law requires covered employers to pay employees sick leave which accrues at one hour per every 30 hours worked up to 40 hours per year if the employer has fewer than 15 employees or up to 56 hours per year if the employer has 15 or more employees.

There is a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the new law, which is still under review by Missouri Supreme Court. In addition, House Bill 567, which was passed by the Missouri House of Representatives, but is under review by the Senate, seeks to repeal the paid sick time altogether. However, the current bill does not contain an emergency clause, so if it passes as is, it will not go into effect until August 28, 2025, which is after the paid sick leave law goes into effect on May 1, 2025.

The deadline of April 15, 2025, when all Missouri employers subject to this new law must provide written notice to their employees about the paid sick leave benefits and display a poster about the same, is quickly approaching. Links to language for the written notice and the poster can be found here:

Notice: https://labor.mo.gov/media/pdf/earned-paid-sick-time-notice-ls-122
Poster: https://labor.mo.gov/media/pdf/earned-paid-sick-time-ls-121

What Should Employers Do?
Absent a ruling by the Missouri Supreme Court invalidating the new law, covered Missouri employers should give the required notice and post the required poster on April 15, 2025 (not before).

The written notice (language in the link above) must be provided to employees on a single piece of 8.5 x 11 paper in no less than 14-point font. Considering the requirement references that the notice must be given on a single piece of paper, it is recommended that each employee be provided with a physical copy of the notice, rather than electronic copy of the notice via e-mail.

The required poster (see link above) should be displayed in the same location that the employer’s other employment posters (workers’ compensation, minimum wage, employment discrimination, etc.) are located.

Between now and May 1, 2025, covered employers should plan with their internal teams and payroll providers as to how they will account for their employees’ accrued paid sick leave. They should also review their current PTO policies and work with an employment law attorney, such as the attorneys at Danna McKitrick, to discuss how the new law will affect their current policies if the new law does go into effect on May 1, 2025.

FAQs About Missouri’s New Paid Sick Leave Law

Q1. What can earned paid sick time be used for under the new Missouri law?
A1. Earned Paid Sick Time can be used for:

  • An employee’s mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition
  • An employee’s need for medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition
  • An employee’s need for preventative medical care
  • Care of a family member with any of the above
  • Closure of the employee’s place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency or an employee’s need to care for a child whose school or place of care has been closed by order of a public official due to a public health emergency
  • Care for oneself or a family member when it has been determined by a health care provider that the employee’s or family member’s presence in the community may jeopardize the health of others because of his or her exposure of a communicable disease
  • Absence necessary due to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking (for medical attention, services from victim services organization, counseling, relocation, or legal services)
  • Q2. How do employees earn paid sick leave?
    A2. All covered employees accrue one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. The hours do not need to be consecutive or worked in a week. Part-time employees also accrue earned paid sick time, regardless of how limited the employee’s schedule is. Salaried-exempt employees are assumed to have worked 40 hours in each work week (unless their regularly-worked hours worked are less than 40 hours per week).

    Q3. How much paid sick leave can an employee use per year?
    A3. For employers with less than 15 employees, employees can use up to 40 hours of paid sick time per year. For employers with more than 15 employees, employees can use up to 56 hours of paid sick time per year. While there is a limit on how many hours of sick leave employees are entitled to use, the law does not limit how many hours employees are entitled to accrue.

    Q4. We already offer a gratuitous PTO policy that provides employees with more leave than the new paid sick leave law requires. Does our PTO policy comply with the new sick leave law?
    A4. Missouri’s new paid sick leave law provides that an employer with a paid leave policy who makes available an amount of paid leave sufficient to meet the accrual requirements and may be used for the same purposes and under the same conditions as earned paid sick time under the new law is not required to provide additional paid sick time under the new law. However, this is a high burden to reach. Answer these questions:
    1) Does your PTO policy provide PTO for part-time employees?
    2) Does your PTO policy allow for immediate accrual upon the first day of hire?
    3) Does your PTO policy allow employees to use PTO for the numerous reasons set out in the new paid sick leave law (domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, counseling, or any of the same for a family member, etc.)?
    4) Does your PTO policy allow for roll over or pay out in lieu of roll over?
    5) Does your PTO policy allow for employees to use PTO days without notice where the need is not foreseeable without discipline?

    These are just a few issue-spotting questions and the answers for most employers are “no.” With that said, assuming the new paid sick leave law goes into effect on May 1, 2025, it is going to require most employers to revise their policies.

    As mentioned above, it is important to review your business’ current employment policies and consult with counsel or contact a Danna McKitrick employment law attorney to determine how this new paid sick leave law may affect your company’s current policies.

    Updated Information on the FTC Non-Compete Ban

    Katherine M. Flett

    By Katherine M. Flett



    noncompeteA federal court has issued a final order declaring the FTC’s ban of non-compete agreements invalid.  The federal district court in Texas held in its final order that the rule was “arbitrary and capricious” and exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority. As a result, the FTC cannot enforce the rule against any employer, anywhere in the country, and there is no longer a nationwide ban of non-compete agreements.  While there is no nationwide ban of non-compete agreements, it is important to keep in mind that several states have fully banned non-compete provisions (California, Colorado, Oklahoma, North Dakota, and Minnesota), and many other states have banned non-compete provisions in certain circumstances.  Just as one example, in Illinois, non-compete agreements cannot be enforced against employees unless they earn at least $75,000, and there are specific statutes restricting enforcement in certain industries, such as construction, healthcare, and broadcasting.

    The FTC may appeal this judge’s decision and it is always possible that there will be future attempts to ban non-compete agreements by rule or law. Therefore, we highly recommend considering other strategies for protecting your company’s proprietary information, such as non-solicitation agreements, confidentiality agreements, and trade secret enforcement. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions or would like to discuss more.

    Learn more about this update by viewing the video FTC Ban on Non-Competes Blocked by Federal Court in Texas.

    For details on the FTC ban on non-competes, go to Navigating the FTC’s Non-Compete Ban: Strategies for Protecting Proprietary Information. You may also view the video here: FTC’s Ban of Non-Compete Agreements. Continue reading »

    Understanding the FLSA’s New Salary Test

    Ruth Binger

    By Ruth Binger



    overtime payThe Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) sets minimum wage and overtime requirements for employees. The overtime requirement requires employers to pay at least one-and-one-half times the hourly rate of the employee for each hour the employee works over 40 hours in a regular work week.

    However, certain employees may be exempt from the overtime requirements if they qualify as meeting three tests:

    1. Job Duties Test;
    2. Salary Level Threshold Test, and
    3. Salary Basis Test.

    The FLSA does not define those tests. Instead, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is directed to define the exemptions and modify criteria from time to time with regulations.

    The Job Duties Test specifies certain duties that the employee must perform if the employee is to be classified as an executive, administrative, professional, outside salesperson, or a computer-related occupation. Additionally, highly compensated employees are also eligible if they fit within a specific job duty test. These employees must all meet the Salary Level Threshold Test and be paid a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction (Salary Basis Test). Continue reading »

    It’s Now Easier to Prove Discrimination With Job Transfer or Other Change in Terms or Conditions of Employment

    David R. Bohm

    By David R. Bohm



    discriminationJaytona Muldrow was a plainclothes sergeant in the St. Louis City Police Department’s specialized Intelligence Division. In connection with her duties in the Intelligence Division, Muldrow was deputized as a Task Force Officer with the FBI and was granted FBI credentials and an unmarked take home car. When a new captain was assigned to supervise the Intelligence Division, the Police Department transferred Muldrow from the Intelligence Division (at the new captain’s suggestion) to a uniformed position in the City’s 5th District, supervising the day-to-day activities of neighborhood patrol officers. While Muldrow’s rank and pay remained the same, her responsibilities, perks and schedule did not. She no longer worked with high-ranking officials in the police department, lost her FBI credentials and the take-home car, and had to work weekends (while in the Intelligence Division she worked Monday through Friday).

    Muldrow filed suit against the City of St. Louis under Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act in the federal District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, claiming she was transferred because she was a woman. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, holding that Muldrow’s transfer did not cause her a materially significant disadvantage, as it did not result in a diminution of her title, salary or benefits and had caused only a minor change in her working conditions. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District Court.

    In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, issued April 16, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decision, holding that it was not necessary to show that an injury resulting from an action taken by an employer because of an employee’s protected status (e.g., sex, race, religion, or national origin) resulted in significant injury. Instead, Justice Kagan, writing for a six-member majority of the Court, stated that “an employee must (only) show some harm from a forced transfer to prevail in a Title VII suit…” (emphasis added). This same standard of “some harm” will also apply to any other change in the terms and conditions of employment made as a result of the employee’s protected status. The other three justices each wrote opinions concurring in the result. Continue reading »

    Changes in Missouri Law Regarding Restrictive Covenants in Business Sales

    Ruth Binger

    By Ruth Binger



    noncompeteAuthored by Ruth Binger with assistance from Kristina M. Stevenson, contributor

    Recent changes in Missouri law have impacted the enforceability of restrictive covenants in the sale of businesses, particularly those involving business entities and owners. These modifications, detailed in Revised Statutes of Missouri (RSMo) 431.204, arguably reduce protections extended to business purchasers.

    Effective August 28, 2023, a covenant prohibiting solicitation of employees between a business entity and an owner cannot extend beyond a two-year period following the termination of the owner’s affiliation with the entity. Essentially, this means that after two years from the sale of their business, an owner is permitted to solicit employees previously associated with the entity.

    Moreover, the revisions have introduced more stringent conditions for covenants prohibiting the solicitation of customers. These non-solicitation covenants must now be limited to customers with whom the owner had prior dealings and cannot extend beyond five years after the owner’s termination of business ties with the entity. This adjustment opens the door for sellers to solicit customers they had not previously interacted with. Continue reading »

    Employee or Independent Contractor Classification under the Fair Labor Standards Act Effective March 11, 2024

    Ruth Binger

    By Ruth Binger



    worker classificationThe U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has modified the Wage and Hour Division Regulations to replace its 2021 analysis for determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor (Final Rule). The previous test gave greater weight to control and opportunities for profit and loss.

    Effective March 11, 2024, under the Final Rule the employee or independent contractor classification determination will focus on the economic realities of the worker’s relationship and whether the worker is either economically dependent on the potential employer for work or is in business for himself. In short, is the worker dependent upon the business to which it renders services for work?

    Economic dependence does not focus on the amount of income the worker earns, but rather whether the worker has other sources of income from other customers. To determine economic dependence, the DOL assesses seven factors and conducts a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis. No one factor carries more weight. The DOL looks at the working relationship, the workplace, and the particular industry.

    Under the Final Rule, Section 795.105, DOL, uses the following tools and/or factors in its determination: Continue reading »

    What to Do If You Might Have Been Ineligible for the Employee Retention Tax Credit Claim

    Corporate Law Practice Group

    By Corporate Law Practice Group



    covid-19 tax creditsThe COVID-19 Pandemic was cause for many new programs to be created by the U.S. government to keep businesses afloat and employees retained in unprecedented times. One of these programs was the Employee Retention Tax Credit (“ERC”) which incentivized employers to retain employees while business was down. The program was available regardless of the size of the employer and included tax-exempt organizations.

    To be eligible for the ERC, employers had to (1) be either fully or partially suspended by government order due to COVID during the calendar quarter or (2) have gross receipts below 50% of the comparable quarter in 2019.

    The IRS began sending out letters in December 2023 to more than 20,000 taxpayers who received disallowed ERC claims. Letter 105 C, Claim Disallowed is being sent to a first group of taxpayers because the entities either (1) did not exist during the eligibility period (March 13, 2020, through December 31, 2021), or (2) did not have paid employees during the ERC’s applicable time period (ERC is a credit against qualified wages).

    Letter 105 is being sent out to taxpayers prior to payment in an effort by the IRS to help ineligible taxpayers avoid audits, repayments, and penalties. Many employers were encouraged to file ERC claims by “promoters” who received monetary commissions based on approval. Issuance of a disallowance letter prevents promoters from receiving funds to which they are not entitled. Continue reading »

    Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements Under Attack!

    Katherine M. Flett

    By Katherine M. Flett



    noncompeteSoon companies may be prohibited or severely limited from using employee non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) January 2023 proposed Non-Compete Clause Rule would prohibit employers from using non-compete agreements with any employee or independent contractor, paid or not, with very limited exceptions. The proposed rule is retroactive requiring employers to rescind all existing non-compete agreements and notify workers that these agreements are no longer in effect.

    The FTC’s proposed rule does not prohibit customer or employee non-solicitation agreements unless they are overly broad. The proposal indicates that eradicating non-compete agreements is a priority for the FTC. The vote is scheduled for April 2024 and will likely be subject to extensive litigation if passed.

    In May 2023, Jennifer Abruzzo, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel, issued a memorandum stating that offering, upholding, and enforcing non-compete agreements may interfere with Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Employees could interpret the agreements as creating a lack of employment mobility by denying them the ability to quit or change jobs or by blocking access to other employment opportunities. Non-compete agreements could be lawful if they are narrowly tailored and only restrict individuals’ managerial or ownership interests in competing businesses or true independent contractor relationships. According to the memorandum, the NLRB will focus on pursuing enforcement actions against employers utilizing non-compete agreements. Continue reading »

    Illinois Passes Freelance Workers Protection Laws: Understanding the Freelance Worker Protection Act

    Katherine M. Flett

    By Katherine M. Flett



    freelanceAuthored by Katherine M. Flett with assistance from Kristina M. Stevenson, contributor

    In a pioneering move, Illinois has become the first state to enact comprehensive protection laws for freelance workers. The Freelance Worker Protection Act (FWPA), set to take effect on July 1, 2024, introduces stringent regulations governing the engagement, treatment, and compensation of freelance workers within the state. This legislation, which is gaining steam nationwide with other states, aims to safeguard the rights and interests of freelance workers, who play an increasingly vital role in today’s dynamic economy.

    Defining Freelance Workers

    The FWPA defines a freelance worker as an independent contractor who offers products or services within Illinois or for Illinois-based entities, in exchange for compensation exceeding $500. This compensation can stem from a single contract or multiple contracts over a 120-day period. However, certain exceptions apply. Construction service providers, employees of construction contractors, and those already subject to traditional employer-employee relationships under the Illinois Wage Payment and Collections Act are excluded from the definition.

    Key Protections Offered by FWPA

    The FWPA outlines three requirements regarding hiring freelance workers: Continue reading »

    Your Business and the ADA: Ensuring Accessibility and Inclusion

    David R. Bohm

    By David R. Bohm



    handicap parkingPart 2 of 2-Part Series on Accessibility and Accommodation

    It is important for small businesses to be aware of and comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA has two sections that can potentially impact small businesses: Title I and Title III.

    Title I of the ADA applies to businesses with 15 or more employees (or 6 or more employees under the Missouri Human Rights Act) and requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities. This means making modifications or adjustments to the work environment that enable employees to perform their job duties which could include providing assistive devices, modifying work schedules, or allowing telecommuting.

    Title III applies to all businesses, regardless of their size, and requires them to make their physical premises accessible to individuals with disabilities. A key aspect is the removal of architectural barriers that may hinder accessibility and ensuring that physical structures are designed and constructed in a way that accommodates individuals with disabilities. Elements such as entrances, parking spaces, ramps, doorways, hallways, and restrooms must be accessible to people with mobility impairments.

    When constructing a new building or making alterations or renovations to an existing building, businesses are generally required to comply with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design adopted by the Department of Justice in 2010. However, even if a business is not engaged in construction or renovation, they still have an obligation to make alterations to their premises to provide access if it is “reasonably achievable.” The term “reasonably achievable” has not been precisely defined, but courts consider factors such as the nature and cost of barrier removal, the business’ financial resources, technical difficulties, the number of employees and visitors, safety requirements, and the impact on business operations. Continue reading »

    Skip to content